computer-generated imagery of the misnamed "Big Bang" and early development of the universe are accepted now as blithely as the oft rejected, disbelieved account in the first book of the Bible Genesis.
now people are sure they can imagine just how the universe began, and it is seen, accepted and taught with as little circumspection as once was the first book of the Bible
but, simple questions to show our human limits in conceiving it...
why name the Bang "Big" if it began infinitely small?
how could there be a "Bang", big or small, where there was as yet no space or matter in which it could be heard?
why believe the current popular CGI image of a black emptiness in which a sudden burst of light occurs where and when there was no dark empty space before?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please, do comment, so I know I exist a bit.